| 000 | 09446cam a2200445Ii 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ocn903248404 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20251028093332.0 | ||
| 008 | 150121s2015 nyua b 001 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) i9781619256903 | ||
| 040 |
_aDON _beng _erda _cDON _dOCLCO _dOQX _dUIW _dXL4 _dGTA _dNZG _dGVA _dFM0 _dSCO _dVF$ |
||
| 020 |
_a9781619256903 _qv. 87, no. 1 |
||
| 020 | _a1619256908 | ||
| 020 |
_a9781619256897 _qvolume set |
||
| 020 | _a1619256894 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)903248404 | ||
| 043 | _an-us--- | ||
| 050 | 1 | 4 | _aKF 8742 .S86 2015 |
| 049 | _aVF$A | ||
| 245 | 0 | 4 |
_aThe Supreme Court / _c[compiled by H. W. Wilson]. |
| 250 | _a[First edition]. | ||
| 264 | 1 |
_aAmenia, NY : _bGrey House Publishing, _c[2015] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c�2015 | |
| 300 |
_axiv, 193 pages : _billustrations ; _c25 cm. |
||
| 336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
| 490 | 1 |
_aThe reference shelf ; _vvolume 87, number 1 |
|
| 500 | _aEdition statement supplied by publisher. | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tBenched: the Supreme Court and the struggle for judicial independence / _rJill Lepore -- _gPt. I, _tThe Court and its workings : Principles and Practice -- _tThe Constitution of the United States: Article III -- _tThe Federalist, no.78: the Judiciary Department / _rPublius [Alexander Hamilton] -- _tMay I suggest a few revisions? / _rForrest Wickman -- _tSupreme Court of the United States: Rule 10 Considerations governing review of Writ of Certiorari -- _tWhy did the Court grant Cert in King v. Burwell? / _rJonathan Adler -- _tThree recently accepted cases shed light on the Supreme Court's process for granting review / _rVikram David Amar -- _tWhy did Supreme Court punt on same-sex cases? / _rTony Mauro -- _tWho's getting the work at the Supreme Court? / _rTony Mauro -- _tA Supreme Court without Stare Decisis / _rOrin Kerr -- _tSupreme Court of the United States: information about opinions -- _tWriting their wrongs: Supreme Court justices regularly seek to change the errors of their ways / _rMark Walsh -- _tThe justices, their papers, and the claims of history / _rChristopher Schmidt -- _gPt. II, _tThe Justices : Traditional reserve, contemporary demystification -- _tJohn Roberts, Chief conservative strategist / _rPaul M. Barrett -- _tThe devastating, sneaky genius of John Roberts' opinions / _rEmily Bazelon -- _tHow not to misunderstand Scalia / _rCass R. Sunstein -- _tWhat is Clarence Thomas thinking? / _rGarrett Epps -- _tRuth Bader Ginsberg's retirement dissent / _rAmy Davidson -- _tActive liberty lives! / _rAdam Winkler -- _tHow Sonia Sotomayor became the Supreme Court's preeminent defender of civil liberties / _rScott Lemieux -- _tCourt sense / _rColleen Walsh -- _tBreyer and Scalia debate the role of established practice in constitutional interpretation / _rChristopher Schmidt -- _tTime to fix, or scrap, the confirmation hearings / _rAndrew Cohen -- _tYale, Harvard, Yale, Harvard, Yale, Harvard, Harvard, Harvard, Columbia: the thing that scares me most about the Supreme Court / _rDahlia Lithwick -- _tHow judges think: a conversation with Judge Richard Posner Jonathan Masur -- _gPt. III, _tPolitics and the Court : The Supreme Court and the political landscape -- _tCan the Supreme Court be rescued from politics? / _rScott Lemieux -- _tPoliticizing the Supreme Court / _rEric Hamilton -- _tBy any means necessary / _rLinda Greenhouse -- _tAmericans divided on how the Supreme Court should interpret the Constitution / _rJocelyn Kiley -- _tFault lines re-emerge in Supreme Court at end of term / _rJoan Biskupic -- _tRare unanimity in Supreme Court term, with plenty of fireworks / _rNina Totenberg -- _tSplit definitive / _rLawrence Baum and Neal Devins -- _gPt. IV, _tMajor decisions : The Supreme Court's major decisions in historical perspective -- _tPrecedent and prologue / _rJeffrey Toobin -- _t2014 Election confirms Citizens United decision based on fundamentally flawed premises / _rFred Wertheimer -- _tObama wins the battle, Roberts wins the war / _rTom Scocca -- _tSupreme Court's silence on marriage rights speaks volumes / _rMarcia Coyle -- _tWhy the Supreme Court may finally protect your privacy in the cloud / _rAndy Greenberg -- _tDawn patrol / _rRichard L. Hasen -- _tSupreme Court deals major blow to patent trolls / _rKlint Finley -- _tThe trap in the Supreme Court's "narrow" decisions / _rJeffrey Toobin -- _tWithout actually issuing opinions, SCOTUS has already decided a lot / _rErwin Chemerinsky -- _tHow the justices move the law / _rRichard L. Hasen -- _gPt. V, _tPublic perceptions of the Court : Judging the bench -- _tWhy the Supreme Court needs term limits / _rNorm Ornstein -- _tCameras and the courtroom dynamic / _rNancy Ornstein -- _tAt Supreme Court, secretiveness attracts snoops / _rRichard Wolf -- _tA modest proposal / _rChristopher Schmidt -- _tThe Supreme Court's baffling tech illiteracy is becoming a problem / _rSelina MacLaren -- _tThe Supreme Court: the last bastion of American leadership? / _rMatt K. Lewis -- _tThe Supreme Court's ultimate test / _rLaurence H. Tribe -- _tThe Supreme Court steps: an architectural dissent / _rPaul Goldberger.gle for judicial independence / _rJill Lepore -- _gPt. I, _tThe Court and its workings : Principles and Practice -- _tThe Constitution of the United States: Article III -- _tThe Federalist, no.78: the Judiciary Department / _rPublius [Alexander Hamilton] -- _tMay I suggest a few revisions? / _rForrest Wickman -- _tSupreme Court of the United States: Rule 10 Considerations governing review of Writ of Certiorari -- _tWhy did the Court grant Cert in King v. Burwell? / _rJonathan Adler -- _tThree recently accepted cases shed light on the Supreme Court's process for granting review / _rVikram David Amar -- _tWhy did Supreme Court punt on same-sex cases? / _rTony Mauro -- _tWho's getting the work at the Supreme Court? / _rTony Mauro -- _tA Supreme Court without Stare Decisis / _rOrin Kerr -- _tSupreme Court of the United States: information about opinions -- _tWriting their wrongs: Supreme Court justices regularly seek to change the errors of their ways / _rMark Walsh -- _tThe justices, their papers, and the claims of history / _rChristopher Schmidt -- _gPt. II, _tThe Justices : Traditional reserve, contemporary demystification -- _tJohn Roberts, Chief conservative strategist / _rPaul M. Barrett -- _tThe devastating, sneaky genius of John Roberts' opinions / _rEmily Bazelon -- _tHow not to misunderstand Scalia / _rCass R. Sunstein -- _tWhat is Clarence Thomas thinking? / _rGarrett Epps -- _tRuth Bader Ginsberg's retirement dissent / _rAmy Davidson -- _tActive liberty lives! / _rAdam Winkler -- _tHow Sonia Sotomayor became the Supreme Court's preeminent defender of civil liberties / _rScott Lemieux -- _tCourt sense / _rColleen Walsh -- _tBreyer and Scalia debate the role of established practice in constitutional interpretation / _rChristopher Schmidt -- _tTime to fix, or scrap, the confirmation hearings / _rAndrew Cohen -- _tYale, Harvard, Yale, Harvard, Yale, Harvard, Harvard, Harvard, Columbia: the thing that scares me most about the Supreme Court / _rDahlia Lithwick -- _tHow judges think: a conversation with Judge Richard Posner Jonathan Masur -- _gPt. III, _tPolitics and the Court : The Supreme Court and the political landscape -- _tCan the Supreme Court be rescued from politics? / _rScott Lemieux -- _tPoliticizing the Supreme Court / _rEric Hamilton -- _tBy any means necessary / _rLinda Greenhouse -- _tAmericans divided on how the Supreme Court should interpret the Constitution / _rJocelyn Kiley -- _tFault lines re-emerge in Supreme Court at end of term / _rJoan Biskupic -- _tRare unanimity in Supreme Court term, with plenty of fireworks / _rNina Totenberg -- _tSplit definitive / _rLawrence Baum and Neal Devins -- _gPt. IV, _tMajor decisions : The Supreme Court's major decisions in historical perspective -- _tPrecedent and prologue / _rJeffrey Toobin -- _t2014 Election confirms Citizens United decision based on fundamentally flawed premises / _rFred Wertheimer -- _tObama wins the battle, Roberts wins the war / _rTom Scocca -- _tSupreme Court's silence on marriage rights speaks volumes / _rMarcia Coyle -- _tWhy the Supreme Court may finally protect your privacy in the cloud / _rAndy Greenberg -- _tDawn patrol / _rRichard L. Hasen -- _tSupreme Court deals major blow to patent trolls / _rKlint Finley -- _tThe trap in the Supreme Court's "narrow" decisions / _rJeffrey Toobin -- _tWithout actually issuing opinions, SCOTUS has already decided a lot / _rErwin Chemerinsky -- _tHow the justices move the law / _rRichard L. Hasen -- _gPt. V, _tPublic perceptions of the Court : Judging the bench -- _tWhy the Supreme Court needs term limits / _rNorm Ornstein -- _tCameras and the courtroom dynamic / _rNancy Ornstein -- _tAt Supreme Court, secretiveness attracts snoops / _rRichard Wolf -- _tA modest proposal / _rChristopher Schmidt -- _tThe Supreme Court's baffling tech illiteracy is becoming a problem / _rSelina MacLaren -- _tThe Supreme Court: the last bastion of American leadership? / _rMatt K. Lewis -- _tThe Supreme Court's ultimate test / _rLaurence H. Tribe -- _tThe Supreme Court steps: an |
| 610 | 1 | 0 |
_aUnited States. _bSupreme Court _vSources. |
| 650 | 0 |
_aJudges _zUnited States _vSources. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aConstitutional law _zUnited States _vSources. |
|
| 651 | 0 |
_aUnited States _xPolitics and government _y2009- _vSources. |
|
| 710 | 2 | _aH.W. Wilson Company. | |
| 830 | 0 |
_aReference shelf ; _vv. 87, no. 1. |
|
| 994 |
_aC0 _bVF$ |
||
| 999 |
_c134675 _d134675 |
||