000			02087cam a22003614a 4500
003			OCoLC
005			20251028092301.0
008			060112s2004 mau b 001 0 eng
001			ocm54066584
010			_a 2004040517
015			_aGBA4Y0699 _2bnb
016	7		_a012272368 _2Uk
019			_a59259296
020			_a0674013409 (alk. paper)
020			_a0674018311 (pbk.)
035			_a(Sirsi) i9780674013407
035			_a(Sirsi) i9780674013407
035			_a(Sirsi) i9780674013407
035			_z(Sirsi) 162406
040			_aDLC _cDLC _dUKM _dYBM _dTTU _dBAKER _dWSL _dVF$
042			_apcc
050	0	0	_aHB 523 _b.F58 2004
090			_aHB 523 .F58 2004
100	1		_aFleischacker, Samuel.
245	1	2	_aA short history of distributive justice / _cSamuel Fleischacker.
260			_aCambridge, Mass. : _bHarvard University Press, _cc2004.
300			_axii, 190 p. ; _c25 cm.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 173-181) and index.
505	0		_a1. From Aristotle to Adam Smith -- Two kinds of justice -- The right of necessity -- Property rights -- Communal experiments and Utopian writings -- Poor laws -- 2. The eighteenth century -- Citizen quality: Rousseau -- Changing our picture of the poor: Smith -- The equal worth of human beings: Kant -- To the Vendm����e Palais de Justice: Babeuf -- 3. From Babeuf to Rawls -- Reaction -- Positivists -- Marx -- Utilitarians -- Rawls -- After Rawls --
520			_aPublisher description: Distributive justice in its modern sense calls on the state to guarantee that everyone is supplied with a certain level of material means. Samuel Fleischacker argues that guaranteeing aid to the poor is a modern idea, developed only in the last two centuries. Earlier notions of justice, including Aristotle's, were concerned with the distribution of political office, not of property. It was only in the eighteenth century, in the work of philosophers such as Adam Smith and Immanuel Kant, that justice began to be applied to the problem of poverty.
650		0	_aDistributive justice.
999			_c100127 _d100127